×

Get the Max Standard Checklist

Enter your details below to receive your checklist.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

The MGS Approach: How Human Leadership + Predictive Modeling Reduces PRM Costs by 30%+

PRM (Passengers with Reduced Mobility) services are one of the most visible and most vulnerable parts of airport operations.

They sit at the intersection of compliance, customer experience, and operational execution.

And right now, in many major U.S. airports, they are breaking down.

Not because airlines don’t care. Not because demand is unpredictable.

But because the model itself is flawed.

At MGS, we’ve spent years inside these operations. And what we’ve found is consistent:

Most PRM providers are either overly reliant on labor or process. Very few get both right.

PRM Breaks Down Because of Complacency

Across major hubs, the same issues show up again and again with legacy PRM providers:

  • Service failures drive reactive decision-making
  • Vendors default to adding more staff instead of fixing the system
  • Technology is underutilized or missing entirely
  • On-the-ground leadership is inconsistent or inexperienced
  • Airline gate agents are left without a reliable partner
  • Equipment and workflows create friction instead of flow

This creates a cycle of inefficiency.

When service declines, more people are added. When more people are added, complexity increases. And when complexity increases, service declines again.
Costs go up. But performance does not improve.

But why? Complacency. Most PRM providers are asleep at the wheel, and instead of stepping in and fixing the core issues and remodeling the service with updated data, they react by adding more staff and inflating the airline’s costs.

The MGS Difference: Leadership + Modeling + Technology

At MGS, we take a fundamentally different approach.

We don’t believe PRM is a staffing problem. We believe it is an operational design problem, and solving it requires three things working together:

1. Human Leadership at the Point of Service

Most providers underinvest in leadership. We do the opposite.

MGS deploys dedicated zone-based leaders inside the terminal who:

  • Manage pre-boarding and deplaning in real time
  • Conduct proactive wellness checks
  • Serve as the primary interface for airline gate and check-in agents
  • Anticipate issues before they escalate

This is not theoretical leadership. It is operational leadership: At the counter and at the gate, in the moment, where decisions matter.

2. Predictive Modeling That Mirrors Reality

We don’t guess staffing needs. We model them.

Before any engagement, MGS analyzes:

  • Full flight schedules months in advance
  • Demand in 10-minute increments
  • Special Service Requests (SSR) layered onto demand
  • Daily surge patterns across “banked” flight schedules

This allows us to build a staffing model that mirrors real demand, not assumptions based on past failures.

3. Technology That Creates Visibility and Accountability

Technology is not a replacement for people. It is an amplifier.

MGS integrates technology to:

  • Capture and retain real-time, timestamped service data
  • Track the full passenger journey
  • Enable high scan compliance to ensure that data is available when needed
  • Provide operational visibility to both MGS and airline partners

This ensures that service is not only delivered, but documented, measured, and continuously improved.

From Reactive to Predictive Operations

Airport operations will always have variability. But variability does not mean unpredictability. As Larry Parrotte, Chief Commercial Officer at MGS, puts it:

“We are not victims of the irregularity of airport operations. There are patterns, and predictive analytics allows us to adjust accordingly. So, when the unexpected happens, we’re ready.”

This is the shift. From reacting to problems, to anticipating them.

The Result: 30%+ Reduction in PRM Total Cost of Ownership

When leadership, modeling, and technology are aligned, the results are not incremental—they are material.

In one major U.S. airline hub with a long-term incumbent provider:

  • Traditional model: $312 per flight
  • MGS model: $195 per flight
  • Result: 30%+ reduction in total cost of operations for PRM

Initially, the airline did not believe this level of efficiency was achievable.

That skepticism is common, because most providers have conditioned the market to think this is as good as it gets.

Why This Matters Beyond Cost

Cost reduction is only part of the story. PRM performance also directly impacts:

  • Regulatory compliance and DOT exposure
  • Brand perception and passenger trust
  • On-time performance and operational flow
  • Internal airline workload tied to complaints and claims

Without proper documentation and visibility, airlines are left exposed.

With the right system in place, those risks are significantly reduced.

A Better Model for a Dynamic Industry

The aviation environment is constantly changing. Seasonality, route changes, and macro conditions all impact demand.

That is why MGS:

  • Aligns pricing with actual demand through a hybrid commercial model
  • Maintains consistent, experienced leadership on-site
  • Proactively re-models operations at least every six months
  • Continuously refines staffing based on real data

This ensures that PRM operations evolve with the environment, not fall behind it.

From Complacency to Control

The biggest risk in PRM today is not complexity. It is complacency.

Providers that rely on outdated staffing models and minimal oversight create hidden costs, operational risk, and brand exposure. MGS was built to challenge that model.

By combining human leadership, predictive modeling, and technology, MGS delivers a system that is:

  • More efficient
  • More predictable
  • More accountable
  • And ultimately, more aligned with what airlines actually need

Request a Custom Station Assessment

If your current PRM provider is operating the same way they did two years ago, they are already behind. It may be time for an MGS Custom Station Assessment.

We’ll show you exactly where your operation is overstaffed, underperforming, or exposed, and what it would take to fix it.

Request a Custom Station Assessment

At Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL), PRM performance is not a “nice to have.” It is a compliance issue, an on-time performance issue, and a human experience issue—especially for Spirit’s flagship station, where operational visibility is high and standards are non-negotiable.

Before Maximus Global Services (MGS) took over PRM services at FLL, Spirit experienced an elevated complaint volume and uneven coverage during peak demand with another vendor. The station needed a partner that could stabilize operations quickly, rebuild trust on the floor, and deliver service that felt dignified and consistent for every passenger.

This case study breaks down what changed at FLL, what MGS implemented, and what improved—operationally, culturally, and in measurable outcomes.

Quick Highlights

  • Complaint volume improved dramatically: Prior to MGS, the station was seeing approximately 75 combined airline + DOT-related complaints per month (as reported by the station). After transitioning, early results indicate less than 2 complaints per month since launch, with zero complaints in the third month.
  • An unannounced DOT spot-check resulted in no findings: No major findings were reported (one minor timing observation was noted due to peak volume conditions).
  • Spirit FLL reported best performance in two years: According to Spirit’s Senior Manager (Jim Martin), FLL achieved Spirit’s highest DOT compliance score in the last two years on all disability-related items, including a 100% score on irregular operation scenarios.
  • Operational confidence increased through visible leadership: Consistent on-floor presence, real-time coaching, and immediate corrective action improved day-to-day coordination with Spirit leadership and frontline teams.

The Challenge: High complaint volume, peak-hour strain, and uneven PRM coverage

Spirit’s FLL PRM operation needed performance to match the importance and volume of its flagship station.

Peak demand outpaced available coverage
During peak operating windows, the station was supporting exceptionally high PRM wheelchair volumes. The most significant demand occurred between 8:00–10:00 AM, with approximately 140+ PRM moves (inbound and outbound), including a pronounced hourly peak near 9:00 AM. Elevated demand continued later in the day, with sustained afternoon peaks between 5:00–7:00 PM averaging 110+ PRM moves per hour, and the heaviest concentration around 6:00 PM. With inconsistent staffing levels and uneven service execution during these peak periods, both passenger experience and overall operational flow were negatively impacted

Complaint volume created operational drag
Prior to transition, reported station-level complaint volume (airline-facing + DOT-related) was significantly elevated—estimated at 30-35 DOT-related complaints per month plus 40-45 airline complaints per month, totaling about 75 combined complaints per month.

Even when not all complaints are ultimately substantiated, volume at this level becomes a strain: more investigations, more escalations, and more time pulled away from running the operation.

Performance variability exposed the station during scrutiny
When PRM service is inconsistent—especially during irregular operations—compliance attention increases. At FLL, the goal wasn’t just to “pass an audit.” It was to build a PRM operation that could perform under real pressure, with leadership presence and predictable execution, which tie directly to passenger satisfaction and retention.

The Approach: Capacity planning, visible leadership, and a passenger-first service model

MGS took a station-first approach focused on operational predictability, clear execution under volume, and a consistent standard of passenger care.

Step 1: Comprehensive planning around real peak conditions
Rather than rely on generic staffing models, MGS planned around the known FLL realities: High peaks, international travel dynamics, and rapid boarding cycles. Staffing and floor coverage were customized to ensure key touchpoints were supported during volume spikes.

Step 2: Assigning the right people to the right work (and building “pivot capacity”)
A core early shift was aligning strong performers to the most demanding parts of the operation (including the complex international flows) while maintaining additional coverage for boarding support and welfare checks. Leadership planned not only for the expected schedule, but also for the “what happens when things break” moments: Late arrivals, last-minute gate changes, surges, and irregular ops.

Step 3: Management presence on the floor—especially at peak times
Both the MGS and airline station leadership emphasized a practical truth: When leaders are consistently present, performance becomes coachable in real time. At FLL, leadership remained visible on the floor, auditing service behaviors, supporting agents, and fixing small issues before they became big escalations.

The MGS Station Managing Director, Reginald “Reggie” Merilus well-articulated the operating philosophy: MGS doesn’t optimize for praise—it optimizes for passenger dignity.

“We train our teams to measure success by smiles. Treat every PRM passenger like they’re your mother or grandmother. When our teams introduce themselves, they explain what they’re doing, respect cultural differences, and stay present on the floor. The operation runs better and the passengers feel cared for.”

Step 4: Same frontline team, different outcomes (because the model and culture changed)
Notably, the frontline workforce was many of the same individuals who were with the previous vendor. The performance change came due to the MGS culture: From management expectations, on-floor leadership, and a customer-centric model that reinforced consistent behaviors. Additionally, MGS is on the cutting edge of technology which includes training and adoption of technology to track assets, plan changes, and report results.

Step 5: Handling escalations with professionalism (and improving the passenger experience)
A practical improvement area was how the team handles frustrated passengers: Empathize, apologize, keep the passenger moving safely, and elevate to a manager quickly. This reduces confrontation and prevents escalation.

The Results: Higher compliance performance, fewer complaints, and stronger operational trust

1) Spirit’s highest DOT compliance score in two years at FLL (per Spirit leadership)

Spirit Senior Manager Jim Martin shared that FLL achieved Spirit’s highest DOT compliance score of any station in the last two years on all disability-related items, including:

  • 100% score on all irregular operation scenarios
  • Team professionalism and friendliness
  • Knowledgeable Baggage Service Office
  • Correct execution of new guest service processes
  • A team “driven to find the right answers and learn”

When the DOT completed an unannounced spot-check, with Spirit leadership monitoring closely, MGS shined. Their outcome reported no findings, with one minor observation related to timing under heavy peak conditions (not escalated due to volume and operating realities).

2) Complaint volume dropped sharply

  • Before MGS: Approximately 75 combined complaints per month (airline + DOT-related)
  • After transition (early results after 3 months): 2 complaints per month, with zero in the third month (February)

3) Better day-to-day partnership and faster resolution
Further, Spirit leadership’s confidence in MGS has increased sharply because of the audit outcomes and the MGS team’s ability to respond to issues quickly and thoroughly. When complaints did arise, the quality and completeness of reporting improved, making it easier for Spirit to respond with confidence and close the loop with stakeholders.

Their Words: Spirit Client Testimonial (from Jim Martin, Senior Manager at Spirit)

Jim Martin, Senior Director of Airport Services, of Spirit Airlines FLL celebrates the successful DOT compliance score with the MGS team. From left to right: Edwin Mitchell (Spirit), Katrina Pierre (MGS), Jim Martin (Spirit), Reginald Merilus (MGS).

Jim Martin publicly recognized MGS and station leadership for the FLL outcome, noting the station’s best DOT compliance performance in two years and highlighting the partnership impact:

“Team FLL achieves highest DOT compliance score of any station at Spirit Airlines in the last two years on all disability-related items… Special thanks and high praise to our business partners at MGS… Together, we are creating great value for our Guests, our Team and our Shareholders.”

Visibility and trust were the real outcomes

 

In aviation operations, trust is earned through repeatable execution, leadership presence under pressure, and a service model that treats passengers with dignity.

At FLL, outcomes improved because the process improved: planned coverage around real peaks, visible management on the floor, clear escalation behaviors, and a passenger-first standard that translated into stronger compliance performance and fewer issues escalating into formal complaints.

Request a Custom Station Assessment

If your station is facing PRM wait time issues, inconsistent coverage, compliance pressure, or high complaint volume, MGS can evaluate your current operation and design a station-specific plan that improves performance while elevating the human experience.

Request a Custom Station Assessment